„DILW/87“ – Versionsunterschied
| [ungesichtete Version] | [ungesichtete Version] |
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
|||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
[[DILW/86|▲]][[DILW/88|▼]] <onlyinclude>[[DILW/87|▶]] | [[DILW/86|▲]][[DILW/88|▼]] <onlyinclude>[[DILW/87|▶]] | ||
* A remarkable corollary! | |||
* The first part of it identifies all men individually and implies a universal, real thing multiplied with identity. | |||
* But this [doctrine] is erroneous because only to the Divine Nature is it befitting to be multiplied hypostatically, or personally, in identity of nature.<ref>{{:DILW/A200}}</ref> | |||
* However, the second part of [this] same corollary contradicts the first; i.e., [the corollary teaches] that the humanity of Christ and of all human beings is the same and yet is numerically and unconfusedly distinct. | |||
</onlyinclude> | </onlyinclude> | ||
{{Anmrkng Enzlnchws}} | {{Anmrkng Enzlnchws}} | ||
Version vom 25. September 2024, 12:04 Uhr
- A remarkable corollary!
- The first part of it identifies all men individually and implies a universal, real thing multiplied with identity.
- But this [doctrine] is erroneous because only to the Divine Nature is it befitting to be multiplied hypostatically, or personally, in identity of nature.[1]
- However, the second part of [this] same corollary contradicts the first; i.e., [the corollary teaches] that the humanity of Christ and of all human beings is the same and yet is numerically and unconfusedly distinct.