Werk:Deepest Metaphysics PYTHAGOREAN TRINITY

Über diese Seite Werk

Werk von "Ken Lee Wheeler" nachtragen!
30. Juni 2021 n. Chr. hrsg.  
Abschrift VideoVideo

unüberarbeitet
ungeprüft
Deepest Metaphysics PYTHAGOREAN TRINITY.mp4

30.06.2021 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xln7SFMuI8

Datei:Deepest Metaphysics PYTHAGOREAN TRINITY.mp4

Oh almost missed the landing zone.

Hello I'm gonna try to keep this simple and straightforward because it's easy to confuse people on obscure and obtuse points of monistic metaphysics and talk about the pythagorean trinity.

And by the way that other trinity the one that everybody else is familiar with it came from the pythagorean trinity. By the way we don't know who it came from before pythagoras we can only speculate, speculation doesn't really serve an enormous helpful, end because people love to speculate.

First we have to start off by talking about the first five digits first five digits of the fibonacci sequence, which are 1 1 2 3 5 let's repeat that again a couple more times, 1-1 2-3 5 yes. First two digits are the first set of the trinity, the second two digits 2 and 3 are the second set and the third is the consubstantiality of the first two sets.

Yes here's the real genuine original metaphysical trinity. I haven't explained anything yet, I'm getting to it okay.

So let's talk about 1-1 2-3 5 talk about the pythagorean trinity, where it comes in and …, by the way, um as far as the greeks are concerned, 1 is not a number, 1 is a principle yes ∞ it's not, it's not a number, it's principle yes, yeah, I don't know if that you know registers to you, but it's not a number it's the principle …um.

I've used this as a simple memorization and talking to people about uh this original trinity by having all of these words start with an "m", they don't necessarily have to be these words but it kind of works out, that is monad mind magnitude matter and man and I don't literally mean man as the third aspect of the trinity but as ontos, being the consubstantiality between of course matter and spirit.

And of course I love going back to my radio analogy, yeah … the uh, the broadcast the actual signal and of course we could talk about the radio station that emitted the signal and of course uh, radio emission, is not an emission as of course as I've said many countless times a perturbation of the medium. That medium of course is uh, the ether, I don't care what word you can say zero point energy, you could say counter space, you could say subspace, you could talk about the akashic realm of Edgar Cayce, it doesn't really matter. Mother nature certainly doesn't care what silly human beings would refer to pure potential. The original denotation of the term the Ether anyway.

The broadcast from radio, by the way, is not the signal. We all kind of suffer from that uh, delusion in that the broadcast is saying well I know tuned xyz frequency is the same as the broadcast – no that's not the case. The broadcast is an interpolation by the radio with its processors its chipset and its antenna and other components and then of course that manifests the broadcast, because the broadcast goes… because … on a real professional radio, ham radios anyway, for example you have pitch and gain knobs and you actually have beat frequency oscillators, you use a thousand things, you can actually do to the received or the tuned signal to manifest the broadcast. We all have that on our stereo systems in our cars. We could tune into a radio, we could change how it sounds, we could increase the treble or the bass – so the broadcast while certainly so connected is not the actual signal.

So we're talking about the third aspect, ontos being, the consubstantiality between the first two subsets and of course now we're going to go to the first two, kind of worked backwards on that one – the Agathon and the Nous. Principle and attribute, we'd have to go really deep in the Monas and it would take about 10 videos to talk about the Aoristos dyas, or the extrinsic attribute of the Absolute, but the first two digits of the fibonacci sequence are really really important.

Now the second digit which is also 1, because the fibonacci sequence first five digits are 1-1 2-3 5 okay. The first two digits are 1 and 1. Now we all kind of fundamentally know, that the first 1 is the Absolute or the Agathon, yes – undeniably so, but what about the second 1? The second 1 is not something autonomous or separate, the greeks called this …

And fascinatingly enough, I got a book that tries to get to the heart of one word called "thomas" – yeah and it never gets there and there's another huge book that I have, it tries to get to the word "anánkē", which very very crudely translates as "necessity", in other words, it can't be any other way, it would be a more accurate way and it never gets to it. It finds all the references of "anánkē" or the aoristos diaz, which of course is the second 1, which is not a second 1. The first two digits 1 and 1 are one and the same thing. The distinction there is principle and attribute, if you want to know one of the really hardcore secrets of original egyptian metaphysics, original greek monistic metaphysics, vis-a-vis Pythagoras, Plato, Plotinus, Domninus, Syrianus, Iamblichus, Porphyry on and on and on that's it – principle and attribute, inseparable principle attribute, because there's nothing in this universe that doesn't have at least one attribute – kind of like a light and elimination.

What is illumination? Well elimination is you know light falls in your head, you know it gives you the deceive … to eliminate … it's extrinsic attribute of light, you know, what is light? When we think ligh, we of course think of illumination, we think of emission, but of course light is not an emission. We all suffer that delusion as I've mentioned in a thousand different videos when you flip the light switch, we all think that a light emits light – you know, that is like there's a a shower of photons and waves of photon – ridiculous. Of course the photon is a conceptual abstraction that human beings came up with, doesn't exist at all that's not my premise even Nikola Tesla and the greatest minds of field theories there's no such thing as a charge carrying particle light … you … the electron…

By the way, interestingly enough the discoverer of the so-called electron J. J. Thompson, he himself said that the electron was not some sort of you know ball of energy, you know,a charge carrying particle, because if you think like particles are traveling down the power lines in the back of your house just completely ludicrous and asinine, it's kind of an atomistic delusion. He said that an electron is one unit of dielectric induction, that's what he said an electron was, which is not a particle, but anyway …

Getting back to the extrinsic attribute of the absolute, in other words, we're talking about the second 1 in the five digits of the first fibonacc… of the first five digits of the fibonacci sequence, which are 1-1 2-3 5. Now first talking about the first sector, we talked about ontos or being, which is the consubstantiality of matter and spirit and this is of course why human beings as Gautama himself said, direct quote, the entire world is carried … ah … carried forth by duality. This is the reason why and then the old saying goes "segne graste negere …" (? unverständlich gesprochen) "if you don't know yourself be gone", or the self is at war with what is not the self, we actually have this consubstantial self when the true spirit looks in the mirror we, … you know, we identify with what diluted person identifies with that, but we are actually the transcendent principle, or the signal in the case of the radio analogy.

I love using the radio analogy because people get a clearer picture in understanding these abstract principles of, of uh, of obscure metaphysics… not obscure at all, it's just that people don't think like this, we were never taught this stuff in high school or college and there are many reasons for that which I wouldn't get into here. But many many reasons, including the fact that people's minds are not geared to thinking like that, that we identify with this existential self, this persona non grata, the psychophysical broadcast, you know bob sue larry her feelings, our likes and dislikes and that would be in reference to the broadcast, because even though we all have the same light within us it is individuated kind of like a single light bulb, if I had like a big pile of soap bubbles here and there's one light, you know, over here, it would …, see the exact same light, you know, reflected in a million different soap bubbles and imagine each one of those soap bubbles is like your radio and your car, yes the signal is one thing and the broadcast is one, you see, the signal is one thing, the broadcast is another and the broadcast is of course individuated, each and every radio just like the radio in your car, you could hit the treble, you could hit the bass, the bass and complicated radios, we have beat frequency oscillators, we have rf-gain…

There's a million different ways you could tweak and mess with the actual signal to personal preferences, just as each one of us once again has a light within ourselves, we of course all have suffered different likes and dislikes, we have different worldly experiences, because the world is, as Gautama said quote unquote, is "carried on by duality", because when we actually suffer mass and magnitude, we then therefore suffer that what ultimately does not exist but conventionally does exist – time.

And I mean …, this is really important, if you ever want to understand time in the case of all monistic metaphysics, it does not exist. Time has no place whatsoever within the liberation ontology of either greek or indian monistic metaphysics. Time is the …, I forget where the quote comes…, "the fire that we burn in", you actually find that in a star trek movie, but they quoted that off of a much earlier source, but time doesn't exist at all. Time is only a measure of mass and magnitudes in their passing time doesn't exist in every ancient culture. Both greek and indian including chinese and and otherwise said, the time is the number 4 and that's the reason why there's no number 4 in the first five digits of the fibonacci sequence: 1-1 2-3 5, 1-1 2-3 5, What's the only number missing, the only number missing is 4, that's the number for time. Time does not exist whatsoever, it does exist conventionally. Because as beings of and this being …, this psychophysical being, you see here which is, you know empirical and consubstantial composed of physicality and a conglomeration of a tuned signal, just like the radio is, yes.

Because, when we…, we used to say in the early days of radios like man that radio's alive, you know, it's jumping right, you know, human beings are the same way, I mean, there is …, and this really gets to the heart of metaphysics, also too in monistic metaphysics and the logic thereof, because a lot of people think spirituality metaphysics is oh…, that's like craziness, you know, it's like totally opposed to sign, there is nothing more hardcore and scientific than true, genuine…, true genuine metaphysics that there is no soul in the body.

And that is not a denial of the soul, there is no radio signal in this radio, there is no genuine fire inside this display, there's the consubstantiality of the signal, or in this case, the radio, or in the case of a person, the consubstantiality of matter and spirit, that would be the ontos, or the third sector of the consubstantiality between the first sector, the Agathon and the Nous i.e the Absolute and it's extrinsic attribute and that of matter and magnitude.

I spent much of my life reconciling light and matter and the answer was blatantly obvious. I figured it out about a year and a half ago. I didn't spend an enormous amount of intellectual time on it, but the answer to it was so blatantly obvious, you know, I've kind of humorously called a matter hard light and what I predicted years ago came true about a little over a year ago, where scientists use ultra high energy light and then they were able to focus it and they spontaneously generated matter and that is the case.

There's also two obviously galactic jets emitting out trillions and trillions and trillions of tons of hydrogen. Hydrogen is just nothing other than ultra ultra high energy light, way above that of gamma, you know, and of course everything …

All matter in the universe is just a compound harmonic of hydrogen, all free neutrons become protons after 17 minutes. Every branch of science admits this fact. I'll stand right aside them and say yes your observations are accurate. So there's only one fundamental particle in all matter, it's just as …

I've humorously called it hot, a hard light, or super high energy light, but anyway getting back to the pythagorean trinity, we know the 4 is not present.

Everybody loves to talk about time, but time doesn't exist at all, it does exist conventionally, but it doesn't exist ultimately.

Principle and attribute co-eternal…, see you actually have two co-eternals really, one ultimately the Agathon and the Aoristos Dyas, the greeks called it Thoma, yes and also two called anánkē or necessity, but it really translates as this is just one word. Some ancient greek words are nearly untranslatable just like the pali word thāma nearly untranslatable, it just means "it cannot exist any other way".

There is nothing in this universe which can be known or even dreamt of…. I mean things are completely unreal, nobody could even dream up something completely fantastically unreal that doesn't have at least one attribute. Nobody could even imagine it, there is nothing in this universe real or unreal that doesn't have at least one attribute and that includes the Absolute, the extrinsic attribute of the Absolute, the Agathon is the Nous.

Yes this is the extrinsic attribute of light, which a lights is a compound, it's a coaxial circuit, the extrinsic attribute of light of course is illumination, they are inseparable. The distinction between the good and what the good does, that being good, … right, what is most good is most close to that which is most dear, or that pali word, pali word is bhattuppiya that which is most dear i.e. the Agathon, or the good. To emulate the good is to be in approx… to be in proximity to the good. um…

So, the christian trinity and these other trinities that exist in religion and religion is secularized metaphysics. I'm never interested in religions I… it's a… it's a… it's a soup that I don't touch for many countless…, thousands of reasons. I don't care what anybody believes, you know, all the worlds and uh … wars in the world. Wars in the world I'll spit it out here eventually are fought, because you know two people are talking about what they … "i believe …" is like "well do you believe what I believe I don't believe what you believe I'm gonna… I'm gonna, you know do you in and …" just all the fighting is… right because nobody is what they believe, people need to get that out of their head and the reason why people suffer that fate over and everything. In the world all wars by the way are spiritual wars and what that really means is, all wars or metaphysical wars. is that people confuse their beliefs and what they see in the mirror, when they brush their teeth, so that's me, that's who I am the most repeated phrase in ancient pali …, and I tell you it's true and there's a reason why it's repeated so, so many thousands of times "rūpaṃ anattā." the body is not the self or soul.

I mean in the absolute self they're of course in all branches of monistic metaphysics logical …uh, greek and indian and egyptian, is that there are two selfsa, the consubstantial self and the actual self and that's the exact same …, the radio analogy works really good don't take the radio analogy too far, there's the two selfs regarding the radio there's the broadcast self which is tuned and you could, you could tweak the bass and the treble and the beat frequency oscillator and the gain, there's that self and that would be uh analogous to the existential self, like ken bob sue larry you know we have likes and dislikes we believe this crap we don't believe that crap, this is the real reason why human beings fight.

They all have the exact same light within them, but they don't identify with that light, which of course would be the signal. They identify with the broadcast … and the broadcast …. well my frequent you know, … you could have two same songs playing, like one on a car stereo and the other one played on like a bose super max, you know, even though you could still tell the lyrics are the same you know they sound totally different right …. the exact same signal but a completely different broadcast because it's tuned and interpreted differently and tweaked differently because we all undergo these dualities of individuation, due to the temporal uh the temporal experiences that we have that are completely different than everybody else and we have our own belief systems then of course you know humanity is at war with every other aspect of humanity and that is never ever going to end people that want utopia or completely delusional. It's never going to happen for an existential being, who suffers the delusions of false identity seeing self and what is not the self. Because there is no soul inside this body, but that's not a denial of the soul, there's no radio signal in this radio, the signal is the consubstantiality of what is tuned and interpolated by this radio …

Yeah. This is the reason why people you know they get old and the sick and they suffer diseases you know. Their body is like a crappy radio that's partially broken and you know they're you know, they're full of hate and despair and fear and just like a partially broken radio the signal is, uh you know foo bard, you know the signal is still there but you know, it's just a mess so and this is the nature of uh temporal existence. It can't be any other way which of course is another way of saying anánkē, but the pythagorean trinity, that these religions took, the trinity from is very very simple, it's uh the Agathon and the Nous, i.e. the principle and the attribute, like light and elimination and then secondly we have mass and magnitude, which are two co-eternals. When you have mass you have magnitude and you have magnitude as in reference to mass …,

Where people do get confused and I talk about black holes here for just a second, we have something that's super massive but no magnitude and that doesn't make any common sense to people, but if you understand the conjugate geometry. The magnetic and the dielectric, it's extremely easy to understand, it's where dielectric completely overthrows magnetism ability to keep anything in the visible universe, because something only has mass due to magnetism having a greater footprint for keeping something within the physical universe, in the cartesian universe, over that of the dielectric, but when you actually have something super massive and attains the point source and it actually vanishes from the physical univers, because dielectricity overthrows magnetism's ability to let anything keep a footprint in the physical universe, it literally vanishes down the whole of counter space, not the counter space as a hole …

But this is the pythagorean trinity, it's not that complicated, it is actually simple, it's not simplex, nor is it simplex to explain, but that is the original trinity of the world's best metaphysicians of manistic monism – Plato, Plotinus, Porphyry , Domninus, Syrianus, Iamblichus, Domatius (? undeutlich gesprochen) – on and on and on both greek and indian. yep…

By the way the uh the first two uh the principle and attribute in pali is bráhman and the second is avidya yeah- Avidya is no different than saying illumination because illumination's in nature is to go forth, avidya doesn't mean ignorance, it does conventionally, but in regards to the absolute, it just refers to illumination, avidya is literally prefectual a- plus vijaya, vijaya is light, avidja is the light directed away from its source, its origi, its nexus, its genesis point and that's just no different than saying illumination in other words.

And. Τhere is no original sin or prima causa or first cause, there is no such thing in monistic metaphysics.We're talking about the extrinsic attribute of the absolute, which necessitatively, once again anánkē, we end up with everything else, after the first two, of 1 and 1, that being 2 3 and 5 and 4 which does not exist within the five fibonacci sequence first four digits doesn't exist there at all because time does not exist I hope I made that simple. I tried to keep it very very uh, I want to say superficial, but very very pedestrian.

I hope you like this, let me know if you have any questions. If you like these videos then your donation is always warmly welcome and lux veritas have a lovely week goodbye.